0.03/0.14	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_2641 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.14/0.15	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.15/0.36	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.15/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.36	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.36	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.36	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.15/0.36	% WCLimit    : 180
0.15/0.36	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:59:00 EDT 2023
0.15/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.50	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5hrxCc1A1Q/Vampire---4.8_2641
0.21/0.51	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.21/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# full_lambda_9 with pid 2823 completed with status 0
0.21/0.53	# Result found by full_lambda_9
0.21/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.21/0.53	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# new_ho_10 with pid 2824 completed with status 0
0.21/0.53	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.21/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
0.21/0.53	# Search class: HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.21/0.53	# Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores
0.21/0.53	# Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.21/0.53	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.53	
0.21/0.53	# Proof found!
0.21/0.53	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.53	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_37, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_49, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_60, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_72, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_83, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_87, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.53	thf(decl_93, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.53	thf(ax_005, axiom, ![X10:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X10)<=(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X10))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5hrxCc1A1Q/Vampire---4.8_2641', ax_005)).
0.21/0.53	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X5:$i, X6:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X5 @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X6)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5hrxCc1A1Q/Vampire---4.8_2641', con)).
0.21/0.53	thf(ax_035, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5hrxCc1A1Q/Vampire---4.8_2641', ax_035)).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X10:$i]:(((~(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X10)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X10)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X10)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X10))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_005])])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X5:$i, X6:$i]:(((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X6)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X5 @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X6)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X5 @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X138:$i]:(((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X138)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X138)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X138)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X138)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X134:$i, X135:$i]:((((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X135)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X135))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X134 @ $false)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X135)))&((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X135)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X134 @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X134 @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X134 @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_9, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_035])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X2)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X1 @ (~($true))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_16, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:$i]:(~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_14])).
0.21/0.53	thf(c_0_18, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.53	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.53	# Parsed axioms                        : 280
0.21/0.53	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 163
0.21/0.53	# Initial clauses                      : 135
0.21/0.53	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
0.21/0.53	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 129
0.21/0.53	# Processed clauses                    : 210
0.21/0.53	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.21/0.53	# ...subsumed                          : 7
0.21/0.53	# ...remaining for further processing  : 202
0.21/0.53	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.53	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.53	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.21/0.53	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.21/0.53	# Generated clauses                    : 14
0.21/0.53	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
0.21/0.53	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.53	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.21/0.53	# Paramodulations                      : 13
0.21/0.53	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.53	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.53	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.53	# Total rewrite steps                  : 2
0.21/0.53	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.53	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.53	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.53	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.53	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.53	# Current number of processed clauses  : 77
0.21/0.53	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 70
0.21/0.53	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.53	#    Negative unit clauses             : 4
0.21/0.53	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.21/0.53	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 54
0.21/0.53	# ...number of literals in the above   : 106
0.21/0.53	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.53	# Current number of archived clauses   : 125
0.21/0.53	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 137
0.21/0.53	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
0.21/0.53	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
0.21/0.53	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
0.21/0.53	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.53	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.21/0.53	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.21/0.53	# Condensation attempts                : 213
0.21/0.53	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.21/0.53	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 6816
0.21/0.53	
0.21/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.53	# User time                : 0.014 s
0.21/0.53	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.21/0.53	# Total time               : 0.017 s
0.21/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 2380 pages
0.21/0.54	
0.21/0.54	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.54	# User time                : 0.017 s
0.21/0.54	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.21/0.54	# Total time               : 0.024 s
0.21/0.54	# Maximum resident set size: 1924 pages
0.21/0.54	% E---3.1 exiting
0.21/0.54	EOF